I don't participate when a pollster calls. I believe polls are misleading. Do not believe in polls. Get out and vote at the next election, then you will get your answer.
It should not go back in the park. If it is considered “history” then it should be put in a museum not a public park. A modern sculpture could take its place.
Poilievre is a career politician who creates snappy slogans to convince us that he is for the working class. Pierre is a huckster. Canada is ranked No. 2-in the world, Its highest subranking finish came in agility at No. 2, but it also lands in the top 5 in three other subrankings, including quality of life. Canada ranks first for several attributes, including racial equity. Poilievre calls out racism, while disparaging our indigenous communities. He is two-faced. Poilievre talks about bringing home powerful paychecks, yet can’t explain how he is going to achieve this. We are now facing the biggest housing problem in our lifetime. He was minister of housing and yet, had no forethought in how he could avoid this future problem while promoting endless growth. This man-child is not Prime Minister material.
It's easier to lay blame on the PM rather than looking at the global situation. Our situation will not improve based on the rhetoric coming from the opposition parties.
The lame duck period of council is coming soon, Mayor and Council will no longer be able to make any of these decisions until after the election. A deferral of decisions would be great.
The issue isn't whether a rest stop is a good idea. It's why there was an effort to pursue a Minister's Zoning Order, along with unregistered lobbying, rather than allowing the proposal to proceed through the normal municipal planning process. Local planning includes public consultation, environmental review where required, and council decision-making. If a development is appropriate, why bypass those safeguards?
Fiscal Conservatism is a misnomer used by the Conservative Party to get votes. It's time that people become aware that debt is a tool used to boost the economy and will always be with us."As Ontario moves forward from the pandemic era, it remains to be seen if the government will rein in perpetual deficit financing and halt debt accumulation, or if the government will embark on yet another cycle of mounting debt. In many respects, the government has continued to spend at a rate well above its economic ability and performance. Key to the issue is Ontario’s productivity lag, which has resulted in slow growth relative to the rest of the country. If the Ford government continues to spend as if Ontario was still experiencing the high growth rates of an earlier era, that’s not a sound recipe for fiscal responsibility." The Fraser Institute
Why not add more revenue to our coffers? Why not penalise those who break the law, in our school zones? Cry me a river. If you are on a tight schedule, that is on you for not planning. Most farmers I know follow the rules of the road.
It's unfortunate that yet another pit will be opened in Brechin, especially since the only way to protect the wetlands near Dalrymple was by making trade-offs with large aggregate mining companies for environmental protections. Ramara has many other pits and quarries, we don't need another pit.
It is misleading to frame this as a battle between “progress” and residents. Ramara already hosts more quarries than our roads, water systems, and tax base can reasonably support. Meanwhile, the financial benefit to the Township is minimal compared to the wear on infrastructure and the risks to residents. It is known that per capita we are over burdened with aggregate industry. About 3.5 million tonnes for a full time population of 3500 people.The ICBL doesn’t stop development everywhere, it simply pauses new aggregate expansion so Ramara can update the planning tools that protect our wells, our roads, and our homes. That’s called responsible leadership. It ensures progress doesn’t come at the cost of the people who actually live here.
I support conservation. I support protecting rare ecosystems like the Lake Dalrymple Alvar.But this situation raises serious concerns about fairness and public accountability.The same aggregate company that received a quarry licence is now selling additional land for $1.3 million, and the municipality is being asked to help donate (fund) part of that purchase.Even if described as separate transactions, the timing and structure create the appearance of a bundled deal where the public is being asked to help complete it.If this land is truly critical to protect, then it should have been secured as part of the approval process, not left to taxpayers after the fact.Conservation should not rely on municipalities stepping in to finance land transactions connected to private development approvals.
We are constantly told that landfill leachate is being "managed safely." If that's true, why is the County concentrating increasing volumes from multiple landfills in one location instead of sharing the responsibility?Leachate contains PFAS, heavy metals, ammonia, and other contaminants. Moving more and more of it through our communities and storing larger volumes at one landfill increases the consequences if something goes wrong.Clean water is our most valuable resource. It shouldn't be put at greater risk because it's cheaper or more convenient for the County. Before another litre of leachate is redirected to Collingwood, residents deserve a transparent, independent assessment of the cumulative environmental risks—not just another staff report recommending a bigger tank.
Some important context:It frames Councillor Sherri Bell as being punished for speaking up. That can sound convincing without the full history. When you read the IC reports & watch council meetings, a different picture emerges.It’s not about disagreement. Councillors are expected to challenge decisions. Repeatedly, the IC found that Bell made inaccurate statements, misrepresented council decisions, & crossed lines w/staff & colleagues. Not one-off incidents, supported by recordings, emails, & meeting records. A broader pattern.Council meetings were frequently derailed. Discussion is pulled off into personal grievances. Meetings drag on, staff are put on the defensive, & other councillors lose time to do their work. That isn’t accountability, it’s disruptive.Some limits on her role were avoidable. She was asked to apologize for her behaviour in council & refused. That led to restrictions on her participation.It’s about conduct, accuracy, and respect for process.