You’d be surprised, data from the city of Toronto has shown that around 20% of summer cycling volumes continue throughout the winter. There are other studies online that are claiming even higher percentages. 20% is still substantial, given the amount of cyclists we see in the summer. That number is also inclined to rise if people have safe cycling infrastructure such as plowed bike lanes. There are other implications which also make the investment worthwhile and necessary, such as people with mobility devices who need to use the bike lane (as Taylor mentioned in this article), accessibility for transit, and for residents who live on streets with bike lanes now being required to do extra shoveling because they suddenly have a longer stretch of unplowed snow at the end of their driveway.
@Reasonable Person - you’re right, it is different, in the sense that they have much better year-round cycling infrastructure and actually plow their bike lanes so the 20% of people who continue to cycle in the winter can do that more safely. @Diane Limebeer actually no, that’s not how the law works. I encourage you to read the Highway Traffic Act, or at least the part that talks about cyclists being able to take the full lane when they deem it is necessary (for example when our council chooses to not plow bike lanes).
This is immensely positive news for current and future renters in Guelph. This bylaw will help keep people in their homes by preventing bad-faith renovictions which are loopholes around rent control. Kudos to all who advocated, including the Legal Clinic of Guelph and Wellington County, Guelph & Wellington Poverty Elimination, Get Involved! Guelph, and The Ward Residents Association.
Bollards statistically reduce the number of accidents, but also the severity of injuries if an accident does happen. You said it yourself, an accident at 60km/h is much different than one at 20km/h. I don’t know about you, but personally I’d rather have a broken arm than die.
As important as this is, what’s more important is properly defining “harassment.” Your constituents expressing outrage over your displacement of unhoused constituents through the hastily passed Public Space Use Bylaw, or expressing the urgency of forthcoming motions around renovictions and a vacant home tax is NOT harassment. It’s accountability, which is desperately needed for policymakers in all levels of government.
What I disagree with is your insinuation that the bike lane debate is about “enjoying winter cycling” or an act of “environmental idealism.” People generally bike in the winter because they NEED to, not to make some political or ideological statement. People will bike regardless, it’s just a matter of whether they will be safe(r) with bike lanes, or if they will be blocking traffic by taking the full lane as they are within their rights (and now forced) to do in accordance with the HTA. That benefits nobody, not even drivers.
@Rounabout They were still revenue-positive. The point wasn’t to be a cash grab, it was to increase safety. For example, Brampton decided to leave their cameras on, without ticketing people (per the provincial backtracking) and found that speeding has more than doubled since Ford’s cancellation of the program:https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/article/brampton-councillor-says-speeding-has-increased-since-speed-camera-ticketing-stopped/The other day, a pedestrian in Toronto got hit by a car directly beside the recently decommissioned speed camera:https://torontolife.com/city/a-pedestrian-was-hit-by-a-car-on-parkside-drive-last-night/Despite popular belief, it was never a cash grab. It was to reduce injuries, protect pedestrians, and save lives.
@Albein the bus doesn’t go everywhere people need it to, either entirely or without inconvenient routes and transfers which require more time than people have. I have had destinations where Google Maps told me it would take the same amount of time to walk as it would to take Guelph Transit.This decision also impacts the accessibility of Guelph’s busses: if a bike lane isn’t plowed, the bus is often unable to stop directly along the curb which prevents those who use mobility devices, for example, from entering. I’ve noticed the same people who use mobility devices sometimes also travel in the bike lane, in case you have any doubt surrounding the connection between these modes of transportation and their levels of accessibility.
@JohnFC I don’t understand your point. People can (and do) speed during and after turning on the roadway. There’s a reason that ASE camera was situated directly after the turn. If they were driving in a way that resulted in hitting a pedestrian without being able to stop in time, there’s a high likelihood they were speeding.
Vehicles repeatedly running into these concrete barriers isn’t a reason for them to be removed. It’s a justification of why they’re there in the first place: to protect cyclists from bad drivers.
@Reasonable Person - Have you been to larger cities? There’s around 3.11 million vehicles registered in Toronto, one of the largest cities in North America. You can have a car there. Many people choose not to, can’t afford to, or rely on other forms of transportation like the subway, walking, or yes even cycling since there are more bike lanes which get plowed in the winter. You can have a car though, there’s over 3 million of them.
I question how this would affect “small landlords,” unless those landlords are renovicting their tenants involuntarily and without cause for the sole purpose of circumventing rent control. If they act in good faith, they won’t be impacted. Renovictions are generally carried out through large-scale or corporate landlords, including the “king of renovictions” Michael Klein who was behind the Brant Ave renoviction notices here in Guelph. Klein is connected to 20+ buildings across Ontario, holding approximately 680 units which have been impacted by his renoviction tactics. (source: ACORN Tenant Union)