There are so many kids behind screens that are going to have few, if any, childhood memories. If the bucket brings them to screams and shrieks it's going to leave a lasting impression. Can't we think beyond the moment and acknowledge that this might actually be something meaningful to these kids later?Plus, it's free which means it's accessible to everyone. Not just people who can afford activities that require memberships.
Society doesn't bat an eye when we put our physically (old age) and mentally (dementia) incapacitated family in assisted living or long term care. Dementia wings are locked. Often people do not want to go into these facilities but when family can't manage them and they can no longer take care of themselves they don't have a choice. Maybe we need to consider a similar type of care for people with mental health and addictions who can't function without crime and violence?
Sooo chemicals in the water toxic enough to kill the fish... and the official advise of the Ministry of the Environment is that it's still okay to eat the fish? Somehow that just doesn't seem right.
Methinks maybe advising not to eat the fish might mean more serious investigations and consequences for the mill? Whose best interests are being prioritized?
From a 20+ year police veteran with an education in psychology. Worth the read..https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/it-feels-like-theres-no-hope-many-homeless-dont-want-a-home-what-now
I 100% want criminals caught and prosecuted. The risk to law abiding citizens is the UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES. Type this into ChatGPT:What are the most significant risks to enabling law enforcement to use AI and facial recognition?